No one reads this anyway, and I need a place to save this chat:
Ekin: In which case, that which I deny will therefore be undeniable, and that which you deny will deny the logic that I don’t deny, effectively denying the logic that you thought undeniable.
Ekin: As you can see…
Ekin: MY logic is undeniable
Alex: But the fatal flaw in your logic is the plausible deniability of the otherwise undeniable logic which is the prerequisite to your defined logic, denying mine.
Alex: Mine is even more undeniable.
Alex: Furthermore, to deny my logic, is to fundamentally deny your own… resulting in a cataclysmic reversal of pre-defined postulates.
Ekin: However, if I apply the reasoning behind your logic to a completely new logic in which the reasoning of my logic has been denied, my old logic denies the existence of the new logic which denies the reasoning behind your logic in which case your logic is effectively denied.
